On Tuesday, September 14, 2021, the powerful PLUM Committee of the Los Angeles City Council convened a Special Meeting to quickly rule on the fates of a number of potential Historic-Cultural Monument designations recently approved by the Cultural Heritage Commission. Here is the agenda, with the audio available on YouTube, and our Twitter thread live-tweeting the discussion and votes.
The most contentious matter heard by PLUM was the potential landmarking of The Weddington Golf and Tennis Club in Studio City, a community-initiated nomination that passed the CHC in April. As the meeting began, councilmember Paul Krekorian indicated his support for the landmarking, with the removal of all language describing the site as a golf club/course.
Being unfamiliar with the Weddington site and still uncaffeinated—the Special meeting started at 8am, before the regular City Council meeting—we initially misinterpreted Krekorian’s support as a positive thing.
It is most certainly not a positive thing, and we should have known better. As call after call came in from concerned Studio City residents, and as more members of the Los Angeles preservation community woke up and tuned in to the hearing and responded to our tweets, it became clear that Krekorian is working with the Harvard-Westlake School, which recently bought Weddington, to co-opt the landmarking process and sabotage the intent of the Cultural Heritage Commission, for the benefit of the school’s redevelopment scheme.
We should have known better because this new and troubling tactic was first used three years ago by councilmember Jose Huizar to alter and sabotage the Los Angeles Times landmark nomination that we initiated. The designation approved by the CHC was for three interconnected buildings; Huizar rewrote the nomination so that donor Onni Group, a Canadian developer, could demolish one to build a tower. Huizar was until late 2018 the President of the powerful PLUM Committee; he is presently awaiting trial on racketeering charges.
The sneaky tactic appeared again at City Hall this June, when councilmember Mitch O’Farrell rewrote the Taix French Restaurant landmark designation approved by the CHC so completely that the only portion of the beloved community treasure to be protected was a small neon sign, an undistinguished billboard and a slab of wood from the bar top. This change was to allow Washington State developer Holland Partner Group a clear path to demolishing Taix and erecting a huge project on the site.
And now Paul Krekorian has followed this same deceptive and undemocratic script, taking a popular, community-driven landmark nomination and changing it for the benefit of a wealthy developer. Next week it could be your councilmember doing something just as sleazy to a local landmark that you love.
The PLUM Committee is where dirty land use deals are sealed, the last step before they go to full City Council to be voted into law, often with no further discussion or public comment. Two preservation organizations currently have Writs of Mandate pending before Los Angeles Superior Court to reverse PLUM and City Council landmarking votes on the grounds of systemic and repeated violations of the Brown Act. You can read about Silver Lake Heritage Trust’s case here, and the Los Angeles Conservancy’s case here.
We stand with the aggrieved citizens of Studio City in their efforts to designate The Weddington Golf and Tennis Club as a cultural landmark, and against the corruption of Los Angeles’ Historic Preservation Ordinance by elected officials. We hope that some of the many people supporting Weddington’s landmarking will consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Silver Lake Heritage Trust’s legal defense fund. They are a small and scrappy volunteer group doing remarkable work that benefits all of Los Angeles.
In closing, here is the triumphant email that was sent out to alumni by Richard B. Commons, The Charles B. Thornton President & Head of School at Harvard-Westlake, immediately following the PLUM vote. Note especially this paragraph:
With the School’s full support, this morning, the Los Angeles City Council’s Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) committee voted to recommend designating the Weddington Golf & Tennis property in Studio City – the future home of River Park – as a Historic-Cultural Monument in a manner entirely consistent with the school’s long-term plans for the site. This is an important milestone for the project. The designation ensures the preservation of distinctive architectural features and general public recreation use at the site while allowing the River Park project to move forward as we have proposed.
Harvard-Westlake is a very small school, with existing recreational facilities that are more than sufficient to serve its student body. We think it’s unseemly that the administration is focusing on a costly fundraising scheme that undermines treasured green recreational space that has been enjoyed by generations of Angelenos, and that they’ve enlisted the community’s elected representative to help them do it.
We’ve joined more than 13,000 concerned citizens who have signed the Save Weddington petition, and will follow this corrupted landmark nomination to City Council with great interest as we also await the judges’ rulings on the previous questionable landmark votes.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. There is no RiverWalk. There is only a hubristic, Krekorian-aided and abetted removal of everything green and alive and public to make way for a grandiose series of astroturf-surrounded mega fields, pools and underground parking for HW’s already entitled student body. This project contributes nothing to the city and takes away an irreplaceable public treasure.
Joperry is right, the 6 acres of public “park” from “dawn to dusk” as Harvard Westlake touts it is actually comprised of a 30 foot legal set back they must do around the 11 foot high walls that will separate the property from the Community that has had complete access to it for 70 years. Someone got creative and decided to convert this set back to acreage, and call it a “RiverPark”. It is a wide track basically- and the developer is trying to make it sound like there is a 6 acre “park” within those 11 foot walls with guard houses that is for the Community. Sad as there are people who believe they will be able to bring their dogs to enjoy the property….. or that they will be able to go swimming when they feel like it… The Council office has advocated at all moments for this developer- against the above mentioned petition of constituents from all over the SFV and L.A. In addition, 12 Neighborhood Councils voted to send letters of support for this ENTIRE PROPERTY nomination- representing almost all of Krekorian’s CD2 and most of the East San Fernando Valley. In EVERY instance that Harvard Westlake presented and tried to sell this project, they were voted down. The constituents these N.C’s represent are in the hundreds of thousands. Clearly Krekorian is concerned about advocating for only 1 of his ultra wealthy constituents…. Late amendments that contradict the original staff report and findings have mysterious appeared, as well as the revision mentioned in the above article. Please keep on top of this! This is not only a historic property that cannot be replaced but it is an environmental, and public treasure in a City that has valued way too few public recreational assets. Studio City Golf and Tennis does now, and has for 70 years welcomed all races, religions, genders and economic levels.
If there are questions about documents coming out of the council office, the California Public Records Act provides a way to seek all records on the matter–emails, texts, letters, videos. While council offices are not always responsive to these requests, everything digital is backed up by the IT department, and a request can be made with them as well. Sometimes this reveals documents that are deliberately withheld from a records request. Paul Krekorian’s office doesn’t accept CPRA requests through the city portal, but you can read other requests on it. And a great resource for how to file these requests is the Michael Kohlhaas blog. Good luck!
We’re wondering if the whole misleading and seemingly unnecessary athletic fields proposal is just a way of banking the land until it is profitable to develop some sort of riverfront commercial or residential complex. Very troubling!
The Weddington golf and tennis property is held by a Limited Liability Partnership comprising two members. One member is Harvard Westlake who has applied to develop a sports complex that is primarily for the benefit Harvard Westlake student body. The other member of the Partnership cannot be ascertained. It is cause for concern.
At the hearing before the HCM commissioners speakers were admonished by the chair not waste their time on the scope of the proposed project: comments should be limited to why the designation of Historic Cultural Monument should not be granted.
Nowhere in the record is there any mention that the school’s long-term plans are entirely consistent with a Cultural Monument Designation.